AMD Turion X2 Ultra 87 vs Sempron 145 |
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Turion X2 Ultra 87
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Turion X2 Ultra 87
 | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C |
| | Lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | More cores 2 |
VS
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Sempron 145
| | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | | Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz |
| | Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,409 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 87 vs 145 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 63 °C | Around 60% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 36.56W | More than 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 10.84 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 39.42 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,409 | vs | 946 | Around 50% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion X2 Ultra 87 vs Sempron 145
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Turion X2 Ultra 87 | vs | Sempron 145 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| S1 | |||
| AM3 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 400 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
details | Turion X2 Ultra 87 | vs | Sempron 145 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.13 pt/W | 2.06 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 36.56W | |
 AMD Turion X2 Ultra 87  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 145 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $30 | $125 | |
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | ||
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Athlon II X2 270 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $179 | |
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Intel Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | ||
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Athlon II X2 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $200 | |
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $125 | |
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Intel Core2 Duo E7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $64 | |
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Intel Pentium E5700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
