Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Turion X2 75

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Turion X2 75

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Turion X2 75

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion X2 75

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 58,500 MB/s vs 32,500 MB/s 80% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,709 vs 722 More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD C 50

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 50

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 28.44W 3.9x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 3.24 pt/W vs 1.87 pt/W Around 75% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.9x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.9x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion X2 75 vs C 50

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Turion X2 75
58,500 MB/s
AMD C 50
32,500 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Turion X2 75  vs
C 50 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Turion X2 75  vs
C 50 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6250
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 276 MHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 9W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 1.87 pt/W 3.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 7.31W
AMD Turion X2 75
Report a correction
AMD C 50
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus