CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 72 vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

E 350
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

E 350
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Turion X2 72 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Turion X2 72  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Turion X2 72

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Turion X2 72

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Turion X2 72

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion X2 72

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,534 vs 24 Around 64x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better PassMark (Single core) score 610 vs 420 More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 12 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion X2 72 vs E 350

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Turion X2 72
1,461
E 350
1,032

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Turion X2 72
2,397
E 350
1,201

GeekBench

Turion X2 72
2,397
E 350
1,861

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Turion X2 72
1,534
E 350
24

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Turion X2 72
1,088
E 350
782

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Turion X2 72  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Turion X2 72  vs
E 350 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.98 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.49 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 492 MHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 1.61 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 30.2W
AMD Turion X2 72
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus