Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Turion II Neo N54L

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion II Neo N54L

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 2200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 2200+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon XP 2200+ vs the Turion II Neo N54L.

Features Key features of the Turion II Neo N54L  vs Athlon XP 2200+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Turion II Neo N54L  vs
Athlon XP 2200+ 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

bus

Clock speed 1,600 MHz 266 MHz

details

Turion II Neo N54L  vs
Athlon XP 2200+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.21 GHz 2.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.21 GHz 2.23 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 20.31W N/A
AMD Turion II Neo N54L
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 2200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus