0 Comments
| AMD Turion II Neo N40H vs FX 6300 |
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Turion II Neo N40H
- 1.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Turion II Neo N40H
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 6300
- 3.5 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the FX 6300
![]() | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.75 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 77.19W | 6.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 6.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 6.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 2 MB | 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.75 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 2 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 6 | vs | 2 | Three times as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.82 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Turion II Neo N40H vs FX 6300
clock speed
Turion II Neo N40H
1.5 GHz
FX 6300
3.5 GHz
L2 cache
Turion II Neo N40H
2 MB
FX 6300
6 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Turion II Neo N40H
1.5 GHz
FX 6300
4.75 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Turion II Neo N40H
1.5 GHz
FX 6300
4.82 GHz
TDP
FX 6300
95W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Turion II Neo N40H | vs | FX 6300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Hexa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
ABM | |||
BMI1 | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 1,600 MHz | 2,600 MHz |
details | Turion II Neo N40H | vs | FX 6300 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 6 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4.75 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 4.82 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 4.75 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 15W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 77.19W |
AMD Turion II Neo N40H ![]() | AMD FX 6300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $184 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs Intel Core i5 3570K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $125 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs Intel Core i3 6100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $128 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $170 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs 8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $190 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs Intel Core i5 4460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $80 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs 4300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $200 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||