Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Turion II Neo K665

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion II Neo K665

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Newer Aug, 2011 vs May, 2010 Release date over 1 years later

Features Key features of the Turion II Neo K665  vs E 450 

clock speed

E 450
1.65 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Turion II Neo K665  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
S1
Super 7
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 1,600 MHz 100 MHz

details

Turion II Neo K665  vs
E 450 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6320
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 508 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 15W 18W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 15.77 $/year
Typical power consumption 12.19W 14.63W
AMD Turion II Neo K665
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus