0 Comments
| AMD Turion II M540 vs Athlon II PCs M300 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Turion II M540 vs the Athlon II PCs M300. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon II PCs M300 vs the Turion II M540. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion II M540 vs Athlon II PCs M300
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Turion II M540
1,307
Athlon II PCs M300
1,120
PassMark (Single Core)
Turion II M540
801
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Turion II M540 | vs | Athlon II PCs M300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
S1 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.05 pt/W | 2.14 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Turion II M540 | vs | Athlon II PCs M300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.02 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 2.02 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
AMD Turion II M540 ![]() | AMD Athlon II PCs M300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
M300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$10 | ||
M300 vs 330M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
M300 vs M600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
M300 vs M620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
M300 vs 300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
M300 vs 3400M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
M300 vs M500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||