AMD Turion II M520 vs E 450

older Released September, 2009

AMD Turion II M520

2.3 GHz
Dual core

Front view of AMD Turion II M520

5 Out of 10

Reasons to buy the AMD Turion II M520

	Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,839		Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 91,800 MB/s
	Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz

VS

older Released August, 2011

AMD E 450

1.65 GHz
Dual core

Front view of AMD E 450

7.4 Out of 10

Reasons to buy the E 450

	Has a built-in GPU Yes		Newer manufacturing process 40 nm
	Lower typical power consumption 14.63W		Newer Aug, 2011

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Turion II M520 5.1 E 450 5.0 Celeron N2840 5.0
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Turion II M520 7.2 E 450 6.7 Celeron N2840 7.0
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Turion II M520 n.d. E 450 n.d. Celeron N2840 n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Turion II M520 0.0 E 450 5.1 Celeron N2840 4.7
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Turion II M520 5.2 E 450 6.1 Celeron N2840 7.7
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Turion II M520 n.d. E 450 n.d. Celeron N2840 n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.4	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Turion II M520 5.0 E 450 7.4 Celeron N2840 7.8

Winner
AMD Turion II M520

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Turion II M520 based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

AMD Turion II M520

CPUBoss Winner

Front view of AMD Turion II M520

Front view of AMD E 450

AMD E 450

Join the discussion

Front view of AMD Turion II M520

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion II M520

Report a correction

Much better 3DMark06 CPU score

1,839

vs

18.4

Around 100x better 3DMark06 CPU score

Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score

91,800 MB/s

vs

53,200 MB/s

Around 75% better geekbench 3 AES single core score

Higher clock speed

2.3 GHz

vs

1.65 GHz

Around 40% higher clock speed

Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction

Has a built-in GPU

Yes

vs

No

Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Newer manufacturing process

40 nm

vs

45 nm

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Lower typical power consumption

14.63W

vs

28.44W

Around 50% lower typical power consumption

Newer

Aug, 2011

vs

Sep, 2009

Release date over 1 years later

Lower annual home energy cost

4.34 $/year

vs

8.43 $/year

Around 50% lower annual home energy cost

Lower annual commercial energy cost

15.77 $/year

vs

30.66 $/year

Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,116

1,127

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,176

642

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

91,800 MB/s

53,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,971

1,056

GeekBench

2,763

2,017

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

1,839

18.4

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

1,303

770

PassMark (Single Core)

737

431

summary	Turion II M520	vs	E 450
Clock speed	2.3 GHz		1.65 GHz
Cores	Dual core		Dual core
Socket type
S1
Super 7
Is unlocked	No		No
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
bus
Clock speed	400 MHz		100 MHz

details	Turion II M520	vs	E 450
Threads	2		2
L2 cache	1 MB		1 MB
L2 cache per core	0.5 MB/core		0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	45 nm		40 nm
Max CPUs	1		1
integrated graphics
GPU	None		GPU
Label	N/A		Radeon™ HD 6320
Latest DirectX	N/A		11.0
GPU clock speed	N/A		508 MHz
Turbo clock speed	N/A		600 MHz
power consumption
TDP	35W		18W
Annual home energy cost	8.43 $/year		4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	30.66 $/year		15.77 $/year
Performance per watt	2.51 pt/W		2.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption	28.44W		14.63W

AMD Turion II M520

Report a correction

AMD E 450

Report a correction

Follow us

Compare

Popular Comparisons

VS

M520 vs 3120M

VS

450 vs 3217U

Comments

comments powered by Disqus