Winner
AMD Turion II M520
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Turion II M520 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | AMD Turion II M520 vs E 450 |
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,839 | ![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 91,800 MB/s |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 40 nm |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 14.63W | ![]() | Newer Aug, 2011 |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
AMD Turion II M520CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 1,839 | vs | 18.4 | Around 100x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 91,800 MB/s | vs | 53,200 MB/s | Around 75% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 28.44W | Around 50% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Aug, 2011 | vs | Sep, 2009 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Turion II M520 | vs | E 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
S1 | |||
Super 7 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 400 MHz | 100 MHz |
details | Turion II M520 | vs | E 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 40 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 6320 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 508 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 600 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.51 pt/W | 2.98 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 14.63W |
AMD Turion II M520 ![]() | AMD E 450 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
450 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | ||
450 vs 2450M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
450 vs 350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
450 vs 1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
450 vs T7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
450 vs 1200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
450 vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||