AMD Turion 64 technology MT-40 vs MT-37 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the MT-40 vs the MT-37. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the MT-37 vs the MT-40. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion 64 technology MT-40 vs MT-37
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Turion 64 technology MT-40 | vs | MT-37 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 754 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
details | Turion 64 technology MT-40 | vs | MT-37 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 95°C | Unknown - 95°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 25W | 25W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.88 pt/W | 1.3 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 20.31W | |
 AMD Turion 64 technology MT-40  Report a correction |  AMD Turion 64 technology MT-37 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| MT-40 vs ML-44 | ||
| | VS |  |
| MT-40 vs ML-32 | ||
| | VS |  |
| MT-40 vs 4000+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| MT-40 vs MT-30 | ||
| | VS |  |
| MT-40 vs 3000+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| MT-40 vs MT6589 | ||
 | VS |  |
| MT-37 vs Q6600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
