Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Turion 64 technology MT-40

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-40

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 72.31W 3.6x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 70 °C More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 21.44 $/year 3.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 77.96 $/year 3.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 3000+ vs the Turion 64 technology MT-40.

Features Key features of the Turion 64 technology MT-40  vs Athlon 64 3000+ 

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Turion 64 technology MT-40  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Turion 64 technology MT-40  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 70°C

power consumption

TDP 25W 89W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 77.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 20.31W 72.31W
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-40
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus