Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Turion 64 technology MT-34

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-34

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 19.5W vs 152.93W 7.8x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 62 °C Around 55% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 5.78 $/year vs 54.06 $/year 9.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.02 $/year vs 152.42 $/year 7.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 1.89 pt/W vs 1.08 pt/W Around 75% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 965

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X4 965

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 90% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,361 vs 504 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,916 vs 429 More than 13.8x better PassMark score
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Newer Nov, 2009 vs Mar, 2005 Release date over 4 years later
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.22 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion 64 technology MT-34 vs Phenom II X4 965

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Phenom II X4 965
137,800 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Turion 64 technology MT-34  vs
Phenom II X4 965 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core
Socket type
754
AM3

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Turion 64 technology MT-34  vs
Phenom II X4 965 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 62°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.2 GHz 4.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 4.22 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.2 GHz 4.05 GHz

power consumption

TDP 24W 140W
Annual home energy cost 5.78 $/year 54.06 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.02 $/year 152.42 $/year
Performance per watt 1.89 pt/W 1.08 pt/W
Typical power consumption 19.5W 152.93W
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-34
Report a correction
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus