0 Comments
| AMD Turion 64 technology MT-30 vs X2 64 |
Released March, 2005
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-30
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Turion 64 technology MT-30
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 20.31W |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.06 GHz | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year |
VS
Released May, 2006
AMD Turion 64 X2 64
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the X2 64
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz |
![]() | More cores 2 | ![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 655 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | AMD Turion 64 X2 64CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 28.44W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.06 GHz | vs | 1.76 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 655 | vs | 452 | Around 45% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Slightly better PassMark score | 1,311 | vs | 378 | Around 3.5x better PassMark score | |||
Newer | May, 2006 | vs | Mar, 2005 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion 64 technology MT-30 vs X2 64
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Turion 64 X2 64
1,311
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Turion 64 technology MT-30 | vs | X2 64 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
754 | |||
S1 | |||
AM2 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! |
details | Turion 64 technology MT-30 | vs | X2 64 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 95°C | Unknown - 95°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.06 GHz | 1.76 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.06 GHz | 1.76 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 25W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.32 pt/W | 1.82 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 28.44W |
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-30 ![]() | AMD Turion 64 X2 64 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||