AMD Turion 64 technology ML-44 vs FX 8350 |
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-44
- 2.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Turion 64 technology ML-44
 | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 8350
- 4 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the FX 8350
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
| | Much higher clock speed 4 GHz | | More cores 8 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD FX 8350CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 159.66W | 5.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 95 °C | vs | 61 °C | More than 55% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 56.1 $/year | 6.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 159.62 $/year | 5.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 9,134 | vs | 591 | Around 15.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.69 GHz | vs | 2.41 GHz | Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,525 | vs | 721 | More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 more threads | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 8.79 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 3.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 5.72 pt/W | vs | 1.5 pt/W | More than 3.8x better performance per watt | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion 64 technology ML-44 vs FX 8350
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Turion 64 technology ML-44 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 754 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| ABM | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
details | Turion 64 technology ML-44 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 1 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 95°C | Unknown - 61°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 8.79 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.41 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 56.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 159.62 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.5 pt/W | 5.72 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 159.66W | |
 AMD Turion 64 technology ML-44  Report a correction |  AMD FX 8350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $264 | $128 | |
| Intel Core i7 3770K vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $128 | |
| AMD FX 8370 vs 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $100 | $128 | |
| AMD FX 6300 vs 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $128 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $128 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $190 | $128 | |
| Intel Core i5 4460 vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $230 | $128 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs 8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
