AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32 vs Sempron 3000+ |
Released March, 2005
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32
 | Has a NX bit Yes | | More l2 cache 0.5 MB |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More l2 cache | 0.5 MB | vs | 0.13 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 50.38W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 95 °C | vs | 70 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Sempron 3000+ vs the Turion 64 technology ML-32. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion 64 technology ML-32 vs Sempron 3000+
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Turion 64 technology ML-32 | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 754 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
details | Turion 64 technology ML-32 | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.13 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 95°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 62W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 14.94 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 54.31 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.82 pt/W | 0.6 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 50.38W | |
 AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 3000+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 3200+ vs 3000+ | ||
 | VS | |
| Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron 3000+ | ||
 | VS | |
| 631 vs 3000+ | ||
 | VS | |
| 330 vs 3000+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | ||
| E8400 vs 3000+ | ||
 | VS | |
| $117 | ||
| 4170 vs 3000+ | ||
 | VS | |
| 4000+ vs 3000+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
