0 Comments
| AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32 vs Sempron 3000+ |
Released March, 2005
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32
![]() | Has a NX bit Yes | ![]() | More l2 cache 0.5 MB |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More l2 cache | 0.5 MB | vs | 0.13 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 50.38W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 95 °C | vs | 70 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Sempron 3000+ vs the Turion 64 technology ML-32. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion 64 technology ML-32 vs Sempron 3000+
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Turion 64 technology ML-32 | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
754 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! |
details | Turion 64 technology ML-32 | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.13 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 95°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 62W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 14.94 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 54.31 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.82 pt/W | 0.6 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 50.38W |
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32 ![]() | AMD Sempron 3000+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||