Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More l2 cache 0.5 MB vs 0.25 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 2400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 2400+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Turion 64 technology ML-32  vs Athlon XP 2400+ 

clock speed

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Turion 64 technology ML-32  vs
Athlon XP 2400+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Turion 64 technology ML-32  vs
Athlon XP 2400+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 28.44W N/A
AMD Turion 64 technology ML-32
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 2400+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus