Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 56

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 56

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Turion 64 X2 56 vs the A6 3400M.

Front view of AMD A6 3400M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 3400M

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Turion 64 X2 56 vs A6 3400M

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Turion 64 X2 56  vs
A6 3400M 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 0 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!

details

Turion 64 X2 56  vs
A6 3400M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 0 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6520G
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 400 MHz

power consumption

TDP 33W 35W
Annual home energy cost 7.95 $/year 8.43 $/year
Typical power consumption 26.81W 28.44W
AMD Turion 64 X2 56
Report a correction
AMD A6 3400M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus