AMD Six-Core Opteron 8419 EE vs A10 5750M |
Released June, 2009
AMD Six-Core Opteron 8419 EE
- 1.8 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the AMD Six-Core Opteron 8419 EE
 | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | More cores 6 |
| | More threads 6 |
VS
Released March, 2013
AMD A10 5750M
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the A10 5750M
| | Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB | | Higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more threads | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 48.75W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.23 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Newer | Mar, 2013 | vs | Jun, 2009 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 14.45 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 52.56 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Six-Core Opteron 8419 EE vs A10 5750M
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Six-Core Opteron 8419 EE | vs | A10 5750M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Six-Core Opteron 8419 EE | vs | A10 5750M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 6 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 8 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.23 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 3.23 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 60W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 14.45 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 52.56 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 48.75W | 28.44W | |
 AMD Six-Core Opteron 8419 EE  Report a correction |  AMD A10 5750M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
