0 Comments
| AMD Sempron X2 2100 vs Phenom II X4 965 |
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Sempron X2 2100
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron X2 2100
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
VS
Released November, 2009
AMD Phenom II X4 965
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Phenom II X4 965
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Much better PassMark score 5,916 | ![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,361 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 152.93W | 2.9x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 54.06 $/year | 3.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 152.42 $/year | 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 90% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better PassMark score | 5,916 | vs | 869 | More than 6.8x better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,361 | vs | 555 | Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | vs | 2.95 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron X2 2100 vs Phenom II X4 965
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron X2 2100
1,400
Phenom II X4 965
6,266
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron X2 2100
760
Phenom II X4 965
1,774
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron X2 2100
49.8 MB/s
Phenom II X4 965
137,800 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron X2 2100
869
Phenom II X4 965
5,916
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron X2 2100
555
Phenom II X4 965
1,361
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron X2 2100 | vs | Phenom II X4 965 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
AM2 | |||
AM3 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
bus | |||
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
details | Sempron X2 2100 | vs | Phenom II X4 965 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.95 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.95 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 140W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 54.06 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 152.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.6 pt/W | 1.08 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 152.93W |
AMD Sempron X2 2100 ![]() | AMD Phenom II X4 965 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $200 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
AMD Athlon II X4 640 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $200 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $200 | |
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T vs X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $200 | |
AMD FX 8350 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $200 | |
AMD FX 4300 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $200 | |
AMD FX 4100 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||