Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron X2 190

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron X2 190

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark score 1,529 vs 1,287 Around 20% better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 874 vs 796 Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better performance per watt 1.4 pt/W vs 0.44 pt/W Around 3.2x better performance per watt
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 89.38W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.94 GHz vs 2.89 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 96.36 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 26.5 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Jan, 2006 Release date over 5 years later
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 FX 60

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 FX 60

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.05 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron X2 190 vs Athlon 64 FX 60

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron X2 190
95.4 MB/s
Athlon 64 FX 60
69.7 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron X2 190  vs
Athlon 64 FX 60 
Clock speed 2.5 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Sempron X2 190  vs
Athlon 64 FX 60 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.94 GHz 2.89 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz 3.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.94 GHz 2.89 GHz

power consumption

TDP 45W 110W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 26.5 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 96.36 $/year
Performance per watt 1.4 pt/W 0.44 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 89.38W
AMD Sempron X2 190
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 FX 60
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus