Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 30.2W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 12 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 28.21 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Higher GPU clock speed 492 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 25% higher GPU clock speed

Features Key features of the Sempron Sempron™ 2650  vs E 350 

clock speed

E 350
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

gpu clock speed

E 350
492 MHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron Sempron™ 2650  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.45 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 0 GHz None
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
FMA4
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066

details

Sempron Sempron™ 2650  vs
E 350 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 40 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon™ R3 Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX 12.0 11.0
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 492 MHz

power consumption

TDP 25W 18W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 28.21 $/year
Typical power consumption 20.31W 30.2W
AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus