CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of M100 vs 300 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Sempron PCs M100 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Sempron PCs M100  based on its single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Sempron PCs M100

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Sempron PCs M100

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron PCs M100

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron PCs M100

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 79,200 MB/s vs 41,900 MB/s Around 90% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD E 300

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 300

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 20.31W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 6.02 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 21.9 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron PCs M100 vs E 300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron PCs M100
79,200 MB/s
E 300
41,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron PCs M100  vs
E 300 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Sempron PCs M100  vs
E 300 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 488 MHz

power consumption

TDP 25W 18W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 2.56 pt/W 2.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 14.63W
AMD Sempron PCs M100
Report a correction
AMD E 300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus