Winner
AMD Sempron 3850
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Sempron 3850 based on its .
See full details AMD Sempron 3850 vs 2650 |
Released December, 2013
AMD Sempron 3850
- 1.3 GHz
- Quad core
4.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3850
 | Much higher GPU clock speed 450 MHz | | More cores 4 |
| | More threads 4 |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3850 vs 2650 among desktop CPUs (up to 45W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 450 MHz | vs | 128 MHz | More than 3.5x higher GPU clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 2650 vs the 3850. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3850 vs 2650
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3850 | vs | 2650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | None | None | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| FS1b | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 25W | 25W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.56 pt/W | 9.03 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 20.31W | |
details | Sempron 3850 | vs | 2650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 28 nm | 28 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.5 - 1.4V | 0.5 - 1.4V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 90°C | Unknown - 95°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 0 | 0 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Radeon HD 8280 | Radeon HD 8240 | |
| Latest DirectX | 11.0 | 11.0 | |
| GPU clock speed | 450 MHz | 128 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s | |
 AMD Sempron 3850  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 2650 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $60 | $39 | |
| 5350 vs 3850 | ||
 | VS | |
| $51 | $39 | |
| 5150 vs 3850 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $39 | |
| J1900 vs 3850 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $36 | ||
| 250 vs 2650 | ||
| | VS | |
| $51 | $36 | |
| 5150 vs 2650 | ||
| | VS | |
| $60 | $36 | |
| 5350 vs 2650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $45 | $36 | |
| 4000 vs 2650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $300 | |
| 2400 vs 2500 | ||
