0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 3850 vs 2650 |
Released December, 2013
AMD Sempron 3850
- 1.3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3850
![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 450 MHz | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | More threads 4 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 450 MHz | vs | 128 MHz | More than 3.5x higher GPU clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 2650 vs the 3850. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3850 vs 2650
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Sempron 3850
15.62 mHash/s
Sempron 2650
13.81 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Sempron 3850
3.92 mPixels/s
Sempron 2650
3.72 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
Sempron 3850
93.75 fps
Sempron 2650
84.31 fps
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Sempron 3850
0.35 fps
Sempron 2650
0.31 fps
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench
Sempron 3850
6.15 fps
Sempron 2650
5.3 fps
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
Sempron 3850
4,593
Sempron 2650
2,618
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 3850
1,689
Sempron 2650
915
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 3850
512
Sempron 2650
534
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3850 | vs | 2650 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | None | None | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
FS1b | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 25W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.56 pt/W | 9.03 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 20.31W |
details | Sempron 3850 | vs | 2650 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 28 nm | 28 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.5 - 1.4V | 0.5 - 1.4V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 90°C | Unknown - 95°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 0 | 0 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Radeon HD 8280 | Radeon HD 8240 | |
Latest DirectX | 11.0 | 11.0 | |
GPU clock speed | 450 MHz | 128 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s |
AMD Sempron 3850 ![]() | AMD Sempron 2650 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $39 | |
5350 vs 3850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $39 | |
3220 vs 3850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$39 | ||
5150 vs 3850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $36 | |
965 vs 2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $36 | |
E8400 vs 2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $36 | |
145 vs 2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$36 | ||
5150 vs 2650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||