Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3850

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3850

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 28.44W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 3400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3400+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 X2 3400+ vs the Sempron 3850.

Features Key features of the Sempron 3850  vs Athlon 64 X2 3400+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3850  vs
Athlon 64 X2 3400+ 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
FS1b
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Sempron 3850  vs
Athlon 64 X2 3400+ 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 78°C

power consumption

TDP 25W 35W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 3.56 pt/W 0.85 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 28.44W
AMD Sempron 3850
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3400+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus