0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 3600+ vs Phenom X3 8650 |
Released May, 2006
AMD Sempron 3600+
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3600+
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 50.38W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year |
![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year |
VS
Released April, 2008
AMD Phenom X3 8650
- 2.3 GHz
- Tri core
Reasons to buy the Phenom X3 8650
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 88,400 MB/s | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | AMD Phenom X3 8650CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 77.19W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 88,400 MB/s | vs | 54.7 MB/s | More than 1616x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l2 cache is just OK | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 0.67 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 0.67 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK | |||
Slightly more l3 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
More cores | 3 | vs | 1 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Significantly more l3 cache per core | 0.67 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 0.67 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 55 °C | More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.83 GHz | vs | 2.16 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark score | 1,998 | vs | 429 | Around 4.8x better PassMark score | |||
More threads | 3 | vs | 1 | Three times as many threads | |||
Newer | Apr, 2008 | vs | May, 2006 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.09 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3600+ vs Phenom X3 8650
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3600+
819
Phenom X3 8650
2,998
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3600+
831
Phenom X3 8650
1,106
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3600+
54.7 MB/s
Phenom X3 8650
88,400 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 3600+
429
Phenom X3 8650
1,998
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 3600+
520
Phenom X3 8650
783
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3600+ | vs | Phenom X3 8650 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Tri core | |
Socket type | |||
AM2 | |||
S1 | |||
754 | |||
AM2+ | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 62W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.52 pt/W | 1.03 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 333 MHz | 1,800 MHz |
details | Sempron 3600+ | vs | Phenom X3 8650 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 3 | |
L2 cache | 0 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0.67 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0.67 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 55°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 2.83 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 3.09 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 913.7 | 726.1 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.16 GHz | 2.83 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Sempron 3600+ ![]() | AMD Phenom X3 8650 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||