0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 3600+ vs Athlon 64 3200+ |
Released May, 2006
AMD Sempron 3600+
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3600+
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 50.38W |
![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year |
VS
Released May, 2006
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 64 3200+
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | AMD Athlon 64 3200+CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 72.31W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l2 cache is just OK | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 55 °C | More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | vs | 2.16 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.87 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3600+ vs Athlon 64 3200+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3600+
819
Athlon 64 3200+
696
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3600+
831
Athlon 64 3200+
692
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3600+
54.7 MB/s
Athlon 64 3200+
52.6 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 3600+
429
Athlon 64 3200+
448
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 3600+
520
Athlon 64 3200+
573
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3600+ | vs | Athlon 64 3200+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
AM2 | |||
S1 | |||
754 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Sempron 3600+ | vs | Athlon 64 3200+ |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 55°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 2.69 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 2.87 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 913.7 | 942.2 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.16 GHz | 2.69 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 62W | 89W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.52 pt/W | 0.34 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 72.31W |
AMD Sempron 3600+ ![]() | AMD Athlon 64 3200+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||