0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 3500+ vs Athlon 64 LE-1640 |
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 3500+
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3500+
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 78 °C |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640
- 2.7 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 64 LE-1640
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.24 GHz | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.79 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 36.56W | More than 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 78 °C | vs | 65 °C | 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 10.84 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 39.42 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.24 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.79 GHz | vs | 2.93 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3500+ vs Athlon 64 LE-1640
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3500+
1,388
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3500+
1,385
Athlon 64 LE-1640
1,024
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3500+
181.4 MB/s
Athlon 64 LE-1640
73 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3500+ | vs | Athlon 64 LE-1640 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
AM2 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! |
details | Sempron 3500+ | vs | Athlon 64 LE-1640 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 78°C | Unknown - 65°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 3.24 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.93 GHz | 3.79 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.66 GHz | 3.24 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.35 pt/W | 0.93 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 36.56W |
AMD Sempron 3500+ ![]() | AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
LE-1640 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
LE-1640 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
LE-1640 vs E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
LE-1640 vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
LE-1640 vs 4000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
LE-1640 vs 4200+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3500+ vs 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||