AMD Sempron 3400+ vs 1150 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 1150
- 2 GHz
- Single core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 1150
 | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | | Higher clock speed 2 GHz |
| | Lower typical power consumption 36.56W | | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 75 °C |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3400+ vs 1150 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Sempron 1150CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 3400+ vs the 1150. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 50.38W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 75 °C | vs | 55 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.77 GHz | vs | 2.44 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.08 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3400+ vs 1150
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3400+ | vs | 1150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM2 | |||
| 754 | |||
| 939 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 62W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.5 pt/W | 0.89 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 200 MHz | 333 MHz | |
details | Sempron 3400+ | vs | 1150 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 55°C | Unknown - 75°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.44 GHz | 2.77 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 3.08 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,043.3 | 788.9 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.44 GHz | 2.77 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 AMD Sempron 3400+  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 1150 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 3400+ vs 5000+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $240 | ||
| 3400+ vs 3770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 3400+ vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 3400+ vs 521 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 3400+ vs 3200+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $146 | ||
| 3400+ vs E8400 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1150 vs 4400+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
