0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 3400+ vs 1150 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 1150
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 1150
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2 GHz |
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 36.56W | ![]() | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 75 °C |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3400+ vs 1150 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 3400+ vs the 1150. | |||||||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 50.38W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 75 °C | vs | 55 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.77 GHz | vs | 2.44 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.08 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3400+ vs 1150
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 3400+
448
Sempron 1150
434
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 3400+
522
Sempron 1150
552
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3400+ | vs | 1150 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
AM2 | |||
754 | |||
939 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 62W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.5 pt/W | 0.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 200 MHz | 333 MHz |
details | Sempron 3400+ | vs | 1150 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 55°C | Unknown - 75°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.44 GHz | 2.77 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 3.08 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,043.3 | 788.9 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.44 GHz | 2.77 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Sempron 3400+ ![]() | AMD Sempron 1150 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3400+ vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3400+ vs 520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3400+ vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3400+ vs 521 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3400+ vs 3200+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3400+ vs 1250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$25 | ||
1150 vs 5600+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||