Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Sempron 3400+

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Sempron 3400+

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3400+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 50.38W vs 72.31W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Newer May, 2006 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 2 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year vs 21.44 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year vs 77.96 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 3700+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3700+

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l2 cache is just OK
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,415 vs 775 Around 85% better geekbench 3 single core score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 55 °C More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.87 GHz vs 2.44 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,422 vs 770 Around 85% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3400+ vs Athlon 3700+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 3400+
48.8 MB/s
Athlon 3700+
192.7 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3400+  vs
Athlon 3700+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
AM2
754
939
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 62W 89W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 77.96 $/year
Performance per watt 0.5 pt/W 0.49 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 72.31W

details

Sempron 3400+  vs
Athlon 3700+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 55°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.44 GHz 2.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.4 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,043.3 978.6
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz 2.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Sempron 3400+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3700+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus