Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3300+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3300+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 3000+

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK
Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.74 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3300+ vs Athlon XP 3000+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3300+  vs
Athlon XP 3000+ 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

bus

Clock speed 200 MHz 400 MHz

details

Sempron 3300+  vs
Athlon XP 3000+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.49 GHz 2.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.74 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.49 GHz 2.47 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 50.38W N/A
AMD Sempron 3300+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 3000+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus