Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3300+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3300+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3300+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3300+

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.74 GHz vs 2.49 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3300+ vs Athlon 64 3300+

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3300+  vs
Athlon 64 3300+ 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Sempron 3300+  vs
Athlon 64 3300+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.49 GHz 2.74 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.49 GHz 2.74 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 50.38W N/A
AMD Sempron 3300+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3300+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus