0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 3200+ vs Opteron 146 |
Released May, 2006
AMD Sempron 3200+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3200+
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | ![]() | Newer May, 2006 |
![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 50.38W | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz |
VS
Released May, 2004
AMD Opteron 146
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Opteron 146
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,349 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | AMD Opteron 146CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Newer | May, 2006 | vs | May, 2004 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 54.44W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 58.69 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 16.14 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l2 cache is just OK | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK | |||
Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 1,349 | vs | 296 | More than 4.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 65 °C | vs | 55 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 616 | vs | 483 | Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.86 GHz | vs | 2.59 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3200+ vs Opteron 146
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3200+
296
Opteron 146
1,349
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3200+
212
Opteron 146
1,350
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 3200+
22.5 MB/s
Opteron 146
168 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 3200+
401
Opteron 146
532
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 3200+
483
Opteron 146
616
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3200+ | vs | Opteron 146 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
939 | |||
AM2 | |||
940 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Sempron 3200+ | vs | Opteron 146 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 55°C | 0 - 65°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.59 GHz | 2.86 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 2 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 942.2 | 987.1 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.59 GHz | 2.86 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 62W | 67W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 16.14 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 58.69 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.31 pt/W | 0.68 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 54.44W |
AMD Sempron 3200+ ![]() | AMD Opteron 146 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||