Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 4450e

AMD Athlon X2 4450e

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3200+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Sempron 3200+ vs the Athlon X2 4450e.

Front view of AMD Athlon X2 4450e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 4450e

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 63,550 MB/s vs 22.5 MB/s Around 2824.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l2 cache is just OK
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 78 °C vs 55 °C More than 40% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 50.38W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.01 GHz vs 2.59 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Apr, 2008 vs May, 2006 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per watt 1.56 pt/W vs 0.31 pt/W More than 5x better performance per watt
More l3 cache per core 0.25 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.25 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 14.94 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 54.31 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.27 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3200+ vs Athlon X2 4450e

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 3200+
22.5 MB/s
Athlon X2 4450e
63,550 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3200+  vs
Athlon X2 4450e 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
939
AM2
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 62W 45W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 0.31 pt/W 1.56 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 36.56W

details

Sempron 3200+  vs
Athlon X2 4450e 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 55°C Unknown - 78°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.59 GHz 3.01 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 3.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.59 GHz 3.01 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Sempron 3200+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 4450e
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus