Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3200+

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 90 nms vs 130 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Athlon MP 2600+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon MP 2600+

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3200+ vs Athlon MP 2600+

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3200+  vs
Athlon MP 2600+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
939
AM2
462
563
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE3
SSE2
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

Typical power consumption 50.38W N/A

details

Sempron 3200+  vs
Athlon MP 2600+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nms 130 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.54 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.6 GHz 2.54 GHz

bus

Clock speed 333 MHz 266 MHz
AMD Sempron 3200+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon MP 2600+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus