CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3200+ vs 1600 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon 1600

AMD Athlon 1600

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3200+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Sempron 3200+ vs the Athlon 1600.

Front view of AMD Athlon 1600

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 1600

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l2 cache is just OK
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l2 cache per core is just OK
Lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 50.38W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 635 vs 483 More than 30% better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 54.31 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 14.94 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3200+ vs Athlon 1600

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3200+  vs
Athlon 1600 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
939
AM2
462
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

power consumption

TDP 62W 45W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 0.31 pt/W 1.05 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 36.56W

details

Sempron 3200+  vs
Athlon 1600 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 55°C Unknown - 55°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 333 MHz 266 MHz
AMD Sempron 3200+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 1600
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus