Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Sempron 3000+

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Sempron 3000+

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3000+

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD Sempron 2800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2800+

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3000+ vs 2800+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3000+  vs
2800+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
AM2
462
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 62W 62W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 14.94 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 54.31 $/year
Performance per watt 0.6 pt/W 0.44 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 50.38W

details

Sempron 3000+  vs
2800+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.13 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.13 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 70°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 200 MHz 200 MHz
AMD Sempron 3000+
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 2800+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus