Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3000+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 69 °C Almost the same
Front view of AMD Sempron 2500+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2500+

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3000+ vs 2500+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3000+  vs
2500+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.75 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
462

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Sempron 3000+  vs
2500+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.13 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.13 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 69°C

power consumption

TDP 62W 59W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 14.21 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 51.68 $/year
Performance per watt 0.6 pt/W 0.41 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 47.94W

bus

Clock speed 200 MHz 333 MHz
AMD Sempron 3000+
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 2500+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus