AMD Sempron 3000+ vs 145 |
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 3000+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
3.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3000+
 | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
VS
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
3.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 145
| | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
| | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 882 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3000+ vs 145 among desktop CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 63 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.13 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 882 | vs | 513 | More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | vs | 0.6 pt/W | Around 3.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 50.38W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3000+ vs 145
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3000+ | vs | 145 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 754 | |||
| AM3 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 62W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.6 pt/W | 2.06 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 36.56W | |
details | Sempron 3000+ | vs | 145 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.13 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 200 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
 AMD Sempron 3000+  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 145 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $30 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $145 | $30 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs AMD Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $30 | ||
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $65 | $30 | |
| AMD Athlon II X2 270 vs Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $30 | |
| AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $70 | $30 | |
| Intel Pentium 4 530 vs AMD Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $30 | ||
| AMD Sempron 140 vs 145 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
