0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 3000+ vs 145 |
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 3000+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3000+
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
VS
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 145
![]() | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 882 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3000+ vs 145 among desktop CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Fire Strike |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 63 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.13 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 882 | vs | 513 | More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | vs | 0.6 pt/W | Around 3.5x better performance per watt | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 50.38W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3000+ vs 145
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 3000+
407
Sempron 145
800
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 3000+
513
Sempron 145
882
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3000+ | vs | 145 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
754 | |||
AM3 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 62W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.6 pt/W | 2.06 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 36.56W |
details | Sempron 3000+ | vs | 145 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.13 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 200 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
AMD Sempron 3000+ ![]() | AMD Sempron 145 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $30 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $30 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs AMD Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$65 | $30 | |
AMD Athlon II X2 270 vs Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $30 | |
AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $30 | |
Intel Pentium 4 530 vs AMD Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ vs Sempron 3000+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||