Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3000+

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 50.38W vs 60.94W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 55 °C More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year vs 65.7 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year vs 18.07 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2354

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2354

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.13 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Slightly more l3 cache 2 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l3 cache is just OK
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
More l3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads

Features Key features of the Sempron 3000+  vs Opteron 2354 

clock speed

Sempron 3000+
1.8 GHz
Opteron 2354
2.2 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3000+  vs
Opteron 2354 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core
Socket type
754
F
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 62W 75W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 65.7 $/year
Typical power consumption 50.38W 60.94W

details

Sempron 3000+  vs
Opteron 2354 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.13 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.13 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C 0 - 55°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 200 MHz 1,800 MHz
AMD Sempron 3000+
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2354
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus