Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3000+

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Athlon MP 2600+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon MP 2600+

Report a correction
More l2 cache 0.5 MB vs 0.13 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3000+ vs Athlon MP 2600+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3000+  vs
Athlon MP 2600+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
462
563

features

Has a NX bit No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Sempron 3000+  vs
Athlon MP 2600+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.13 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.13 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 50.38W N/A

bus

Clock speed 200 MHz 266 MHz
AMD Sempron 3000+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon MP 2600+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus