Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Sempron 3000+ vs the Athlon 64 X2 4400+.

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Report a correction
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3000+ vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3000+  vs
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
754
AM2
939

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Sempron 3000+  vs
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.13 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.13 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 62W 65W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 0.6 pt/W 0.89 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 52.81W
AMD Sempron 3000+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus