Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Sempron 3000+ vs the Athlon 64 3400+.

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3400+

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 3000+ vs Athlon 64 3400+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 3000+  vs
Athlon 64 3400+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
939

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Sempron 3000+  vs
Athlon 64 3400+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.13 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.13 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 50.38W N/A
AMD Sempron 3000+
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus