AMD Sempron 3000+ vs Athlon 64 3000+ |
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 3000+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3000+
 | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 50.38W |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 64 3000+
| | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 72.31W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.13 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Sempron 3000+ vs Athlon 64 3000+
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 3000+ | vs | Athlon 64 3000+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 754 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE2 | |||
details | Sempron 3000+ | vs | Athlon 64 3000+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.13 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 130 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 62W | 89W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 72.31W | |
 AMD Sempron 3000+  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
