Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Sempron 140

AMD Sempron 140

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 2800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2800+

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 63 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD Sempron 140

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 140

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 1 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l3 cache is just OK
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 70% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 839 vs 487 More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much better performance per watt 1.95 pt/W vs 0.44 pt/W Around 4.5x better performance per watt
Much more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.69 GHz vs 2.36 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 50.38W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.93 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2009 vs Jul, 2004 Release date over 5 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 14.94 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 54.31 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2800+ vs 140

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 2800+
43.2 MB/s
Sempron 140
105,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 2800+  vs
140 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
AM2
462
AM3
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

Sempron 2800+  vs
140 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 63°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 1 5
Overclock review score 0 2
Overclocked clock speed 2.36 GHz 3.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 3.93 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 543.6 1,557.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.36 GHz 3.69 GHz

power consumption

TDP 62W 45W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 0.44 pt/W 1.95 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 36.56W

bus

Clock speed 200 MHz 2,000 MHz
AMD Sempron 2800+
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 140
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus