AMD Sempron 2800+ vs 140 |
Released July, 2004
AMD Sempron 2800+
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2800+
 | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
VS
Released July, 2009
AMD Sempron 140
- 2.7 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 140
| | Much more l3 cache 1 MB | | Much more l2 cache 1 MB |
| | Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz | | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Sempron 140CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 63 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
| Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.7 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 70% higher clock speed | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 839 | vs | 487 | More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 1.95 pt/W | vs | 0.44 pt/W | Around 4.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.69 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 50.38W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.93 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2009 | vs | Jul, 2004 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2800+ vs 140
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 2800+ | vs | 140 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 754 | |||
| AM2 | |||
| 462 | |||
| AM3 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
details | Sempron 2800+ | vs | 140 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 0 MB | 1 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 1 | 5 | |
| Overclock review score | 0 | 2 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 3.69 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 3.93 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 543.6 | 1,557.8 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 3.69 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 62W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.44 pt/W | 1.95 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 200 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
 AMD Sempron 2800+  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 140 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 5000+ vs 140 | ||
 | VS | |
| 250 vs 140 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 3220 vs 140 | ||
 | VS | |
| $30 | ||
| 145 vs 140 | ||
 | VS | |
| E6300 vs 140 | ||
 | VS | |
| $95 | ||
| 955 vs 140 | ||
 | VS | |
| 240 vs 140 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
