0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon II X2 240 |
Released July, 2004
AMD Sempron 2800+
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2800+
![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 50.38W | ![]() | Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year |
![]() | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2009
AMD Athlon II X2 240
- 2.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Athlon II X2 240
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 1 MB |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 240CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 52.81W | Around 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | Around 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l3 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 75% higher clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark score | 1,642 | vs | 398 | Around 4.2x better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 938 | vs | 487 | Around 95% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,513 | vs | 682 | Around 3.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better performance per watt | 1.67 pt/W | vs | 0.44 pt/W | More than 3.8x better performance per watt | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.67 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 74 °C | vs | 70 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jul, 2009 | vs | Jul, 2004 | Release date over 5 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon II X2 240
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 2800+
630
Athlon II X2 240
2,624
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 2800+
635
Athlon II X2 240
1,423
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 2800+
43.2 MB/s
Athlon II X2 240
112,300 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 2800+
682
Athlon II X2 240
2,513
GeekBench
Sempron 2800+
1,241
Athlon II X2 240
4,487
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 2800+
398
Athlon II X2 240
1,642
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 2800+
487
Athlon II X2 240
938
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon II X2 240 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 0 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
754 | |||
AM2 | |||
462 | |||
AM3 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 62W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.44 pt/W | 1.67 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 200 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
details | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon II X2 240 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 1 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 1 | 23 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 3.67 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 543.6 | 2,103.5 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 3.67 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Sempron 2800+ ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 240 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||