AMD Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon 64 3200+ |
Released July, 2004
AMD Sempron 2800+
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2800+
 | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 50.38W |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year |
VS
Released May, 2006
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 64 3200+
| | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz |
| | Has virtualization support Yes | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 72.31W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.69 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.87 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | May, 2006 | vs | Jul, 2004 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon 64 3200+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 754 | |||
| AM2 | |||
| 462 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 130 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 1 | 3 | |
| Overclock review score | 0 | 0 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 2.69 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.87 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 543.6 | 942.2 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 2.69 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 62W | 89W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.44 pt/W | 0.34 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 72.31W | |
 AMD Sempron 2800+  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $69 | ||
| 3200+ vs 630 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 3200+ vs 3000+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 3200+ vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 3200+ vs 3800+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| 3200+ vs LE-1640 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $150 | ||
| 3200+ vs 2100 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $145 | ||
| 3200+ vs E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
