0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon 3200+ |
Released July, 2004
AMD Sempron 2800+
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2800+
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 50.38W |
![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Athlon 3200+
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 3200+
![]() | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz |
![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 49 °C | Around 45% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 54.44W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 58.69 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 16.14 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core |
Features Key features of the Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon 3200+
clock speed
Sempron 2800+
1.6 GHz
Athlon 3200+
2 GHz
L2 cache
Sempron 2800+
0.5 MB
Athlon 3200+
1 MB
L3 cache
Sempron 2800+
0 MB
Athlon 3200+
0 MB
TDP
Sempron 2800+
62W
Athlon 3200+
67W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon 3200+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
754 | |||
AM2 | |||
462 | |||
939 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 62W | 67W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 16.14 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 58.69 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 54.44W |
details | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon 3200+ |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 49°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 1 | 4 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Sempron 2800+ ![]() | AMD Athlon 3200+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||