0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon 2800+ |
Released July, 2004
AMD Sempron 2800+
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2800+
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 50.38W |
![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year |
VS
Released May, 2004
AMD Athlon 2800+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 2800+
![]() | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | AMD Athlon 2800+CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 72.31W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.57 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon 2800+
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 2800+
682
Athlon 2800+
682
GeekBench
Sempron 2800+
1,241
Athlon 2800+
1,241
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 2800+
398
Athlon 2800+
438
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 2800+
487
Athlon 2800+
512
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon 2800+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
754 | |||
AM2 | |||
462 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 62W | 89W | |
Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.44 pt/W | 0.42 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 72.31W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 200 MHz | 266 MHz |
details | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon 2800+ |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 1 | 1 | |
Overclock review score | 0 | 0 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 2.57 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 2.57 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Sempron 2800+ ![]() | AMD Athlon 2800+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | ||
2800+ vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
2800+ vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
2800+ vs 2500+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
2800+ vs 3000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
2800+ vs 3200+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
2800+ vs 3000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
2800+ vs 330 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||