AMD Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon 2800+ |
Released July, 2004
AMD Sempron 2800+
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2800+
 | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 50.38W |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year |
VS
Released May, 2004
AMD Athlon 2800+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon 2800+
| | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
| | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Athlon 2800+CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 72.31W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.57 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.13 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon 2800+
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon 2800+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 754 | |||
| AM2 | |||
| 462 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 62W | 89W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.44 pt/W | 0.42 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 50.38W | 72.31W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 200 MHz | 266 MHz | |
details | Sempron 2800+ | vs | Athlon 2800+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 0 MB | 0 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 130 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 1 | 1 | |
| Overclock review score | 0 | 0 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.36 GHz | 2.57 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.36 GHz | 2.57 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 AMD Sempron 2800+  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 2800+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $70 | ||
| 2800+ vs 641 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 2800+ vs 3000+ | ||
 | VS |  |
| 2800+ vs 3200+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $69 | ||
| 2800+ vs 630 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 2800+ vs 3000+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| 2800+ vs 1800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| 2800+ vs G2020 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
