CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2650 vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Sempron 2650 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Sempron 2650  based on its single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Sempron 2650

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Sempron 2650

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 2650

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2650

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 732,100 MB/s vs 51,600 MB/s Around 14.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 13.81 mHash/s vs 7.51 mHash/s Around 85% better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score
Much better performance per watt 9.03 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W More than 6x better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 30.2W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Newer Dec, 2013 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 3 years later
Higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 90 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 12 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 28.21 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 492 MHz vs 128 MHz More than 3.8x higher GPU clock speed
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2650 vs E 350

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Sempron 2650
13.81 mHash/s
E 350
7.51 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Sempron 2650
84.31 fps
E 350
50.77 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Sempron 2650
0.31 fps
E 350
0.1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 2650
1,413
E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 2650
732,100 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 2650  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed None None
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066

details

Sempron 2650  vs
E 350 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.5 - 1.4V 1.25 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Radeon HD 8240 Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX 11.0 11.0
GPU clock speed 128 MHz 492 MHz

power consumption

TDP 25W 18W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 9.03 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 30.2W
AMD Sempron 2650
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus