AMD Sempron 2650 vs Athlon 64 X2 3250e |
Released December, 2013
AMD Sempron 2650
- 1.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2650
 | Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W | | Much lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year |
| | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 97.88W | 4.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 40.46 $/year | 6.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 89.18 $/year | 4.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 X2 3250e vs the Sempron 2650. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2650 vs Athlon 64 X2 3250e
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 2650 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 3250e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| FS1b | |||
| AM2 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Sempron 2650 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 3250e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 28 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 95°C | Unknown - 85°C | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 25W | 22W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 40.46 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | 89.18 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 9.03 pt/W | 0.32 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 97.88W | |
 AMD Sempron 2650  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $36 | ||
| AMD Sempron 2650 vs Athlon 5150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $36 | $179 | |
| AMD Sempron 2650 vs Intel Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $36 | $45 | |
| AMD Sempron 2650 vs A4 4000 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $36 | ||
| AMD Sempron 2650 vs E 350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $36 | $39 | |
| AMD Sempron 2650 vs 3850 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $36 | $72 | |
| AMD Sempron 2650 vs Intel Celeron J1800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $36 | ||
| AMD Sempron 2650 vs Athlon II X2 250 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
