Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Sempron 140

AMD Sempron 140

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 2600+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2600+

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 63 °C More than 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD Sempron 140

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 140

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 105,900 MB/s vs 22.7 MB/s Around 4665.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.69 GHz vs 2.41 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 50.38W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2009 vs Jul, 2004 Release date over 5 years later
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,324 vs 264 More than 5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better performance per watt 1.95 pt/W vs 0.31 pt/W More than 6.2x better performance per watt
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.93 GHz vs 1.83 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 14.94 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 54.31 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2600+ vs 140

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 2600+
22.7 MB/s
Sempron 140
105,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 2600+  vs
140 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
754
462
AM3

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 200 MHz 2,000 MHz

details

Sempron 2600+  vs
140 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 63°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 0 5
Overclock review score 0 2
Overclocked clock speed 2.41 GHz 3.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.83 GHz 3.93 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 57.1 1,557.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.41 GHz 3.69 GHz

power consumption

TDP 62W 45W
Annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 0.31 pt/W 1.95 pt/W
Typical power consumption 50.38W 36.56W
AMD Sempron 2600+
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 140
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus